fencingforum.com

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Union Budget 2023 Live Update on Tech Announcements: No Updates on Cryptocurrencies or Digital Assets

    February 1, 2023

    Celsius publishes list of users eligible to withdraw most of its assets

    February 1, 2023

    5 Trending headlines in beef industry

    February 1, 2023
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    fencingforum.com
    • Home
    • News

      The impact of Google and other tech layoffs on other industries

      January 31, 2023

      Google, Facebook, and Microsoft want to be scrappy startups again

      January 30, 2023

      Why are Tesla fires so hard to put out?

      January 27, 2023

      Thanks to OpenAI, Microsoft beats Google in the artificial intelligence game

      January 26, 2023

      Facebook lifts ban on former President Donald Trump

      January 25, 2023
    • Crypto

      Celsius publishes list of users eligible to withdraw most of its assets

      February 1, 2023

      Michael Barry shocks crypto community with one-word tweet

      February 1, 2023

      Crypto-friendly banks end loans backed by crypto mining rigs

      February 1, 2023

      Losses from cryptocurrency exploits dropped nearly 93% year-over-year in January

      February 1, 2023

      Crypto scammers exploit ‘loose’ UK company law to trick victims: report

      February 1, 2023
    • Startup

      Cargill takes a ‘startup’ approach to new ideas

      February 1, 2023

      Ashland Startup Incubator Rolls Out New Pitch Competition Program

      February 1, 2023

      7 steps to launch and run a startup tech company

      February 1, 2023

      Free Healthcare Clinics at IndyGo Stations Continue After ‘Powerful’ Startup – WISH-TV | WISH-TV Indianapolis News | Indiana Weather

      February 1, 2023

      Tech startups looking to fill tech gaps

      February 1, 2023
    • Technology

      Union Budget 2023 Live Update on Tech Announcements: No Updates on Cryptocurrencies or Digital Assets

      February 1, 2023

      Jamestown City Council Tests Video Conferencing Tech | News, Sports, Jobs

      February 1, 2023

      Jereh Showcases Innovative ESG Compliant Fracturing Technology at HFTC2023

      February 1, 2023

      South Korea posts record trade deficit as tech demand drops

      February 1, 2023

      Chip Wars: Japan and Holland Expected to Join US in Ban on Technology Exports to China | Technology

      February 1, 2023
    • Trending

      5 Trending headlines in beef industry

      February 1, 2023

      Trend: SK Hynix Swings to Quarterly Losses

      February 1, 2023

      Update your look with the trending glaze drip

      February 1, 2023

      Traditional Designer ‘khadau’ trending at this year’s Magh Mela | Allahabad News

      February 1, 2023

      Arizona Goes Dancing, ASU Trends Out

      February 1, 2023
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    fencingforum.com
    Home»News»California rejects Proposition 30 to tax the rich on electric car purchases
    News

    California rejects Proposition 30 to tax the rich on electric car purchases

    admin1By admin1November 9, 20226 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    On Tuesday, voters in California voted down a bill that would tax the state’s wealthiest residents to boost sales of electric cars, especially for low-income earners.

    This measure, Proposition 30, was intended to help the Golden State meet its aggressive clean air and climate change goals. Transportation is the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. In August, California’s Air Resources Board decided to ban the sale of gasoline and diesel vehicles by 2035. The state, he said, passed a law in September calling for a 40% reduction in emissions and zero climate impact by 2030 compared to 1990 levels. Legislators have also approved nearly $54 billion to fund climate change adaptation and mitigation.

    Max Baumhefner, senior attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council, one of the groups backing Proposition 30, said:

    To achieve this goal, Prop 30 was intended to fund electric vehicles, charging stations, and wildfire protection. The funds were to be subject to a 1.75% tax on income over $2 million. Proponents estimate that in 20 years he will raise $100 billion, more than half of which will go to low-income and disadvantaged communities. The vote took place on the anniversary of the 2018 Campfire, the deadliest and most devastating wildfire in state history.

    Prop. 30 was one of the most overtly redistributive climate policies ever put on the ballot, and was initially popular. A summer poll put two-thirds of Californians in favor of him. But the business group, along with California Governor Gavin Newsom, actively opposed Proposition 30 and tipped against size. Newsom said in its ad that Proposition 30 was “devised by a single corporation to collect state income taxes and benefit the corporation.” That company, ride-hailing company Lyft, spent his $45 million lobbying for Proposition 30. .

    As of Wednesday morning, 41 percent of the vote had reported and 59 percent of Californians voted NO on Proposition 30. The Associated Press called the bill defeated.

    Much of the dynamic here is unique to California. “It’s easy to overinterpret this one vote,” Shaun Bowler, a professor of political science at the University of California, Riverside, said in an email.

    But much of the rest of the country has a habit of following California’s lead, especially when it comes to cars.As other states consider how to meet their own climate goals, Prop. 30’s failure will teach some important lessons. may provide.

    What does the failure of Prop. 30 mean for other countries?

    One of the major concerns in the clean energy transition is whether those most directly affected by issues such as air pollution and the effects of climate change will be the last to benefit from green jobs and low-emission technologies. It is often not. .

    Especially when it comes to cars. Low-income, minority, and disadvantaged communities often have more roads, less green space, and these roads contain disproportionately older, more polluted vehicles. That is why environmentalists have embraced the idea of ​​a just transition to ensure that environmental and economic benefits are distributed more fairly as we adapt and mitigate change.

    Vehicle electrification in low-income communities is one way to do this. More EVs and fewer petrol cars would have immediate health benefits while reducing our impact on climate change. Companies like Lyft also benefit.

    “Generally speaking, their drivers are low income and need help to buy these cars, which is a good thing. It’s a way of offsetting ,” Bowler said.

    However, EVs are still more expensive than gasoline cars and trucks. The average US car price this year was about $48,000, while the average price of an electric car was $66,000. Even with subsidies aimed at low-income earners, EVs may not be affordable enough for most people until manufacturers cut prices further.

    “I think we need to manage expectations,” said Katherine Wolfram, a visiting professor at the Harvard Kennedy School who studies energy and environmental economics. Ginger, but I don’t think you can joke that it helps the poor.”

    Another problem is that if California goes further in taxing the wealthy, some residents may move to other states. “I think it’s probably better if it’s done at the federal level rather than at the state level,” Wolfram said.

    The federal government has already enacted some major steps to put more electric cars, trucks and buses on the road. Both the bipartisan Infrastructure Act and the Inflation Reduction Act allocated billions of dollars for electric vehicles and charging stations.

    A cynical reading of Proposition 30’s failure is that politicians will do everything in their power to protect wealthy donors, even in blue states and at the expense of declared climate change goals. Taxes are particularly difficult to sell. Washington voters flinched twice when a carbon tax was put on the ballot.

    But the fact that the majority initially supported Proposition 30 shows that there is a desire for incremental steps to address rising average temperatures. “At a high level, all states need to consider how those most affected by air pollution will soon realize the benefits of reducing air pollution,” Baumhefner said. I’m here.

    And states should look beyond cars. For low-income communities, the most effective solution to local pollution and climate change may not be to switch to cleaner cars, but to get out of the car altogether. Improving public transport, creating more walkable neighborhoods, and small electric vehicles like bicycles have the potential to offer greater health and environmental benefits than just electric vehicles.

    Even states like California that have set zero greenhouse gas emissions as their destination are still in thorny debate about the best route to get there, and there are many holes in the road ahead. One thing is clear.

    Help us keep articles like this for free

    Understanding the political realm of America can be overwhelming. That’s where Vox comes in. We aim to bring research-based, smart, and accessible information to everyone who needs it.

    Gifts from readers help keep our work free, whether it’s adding nuanced context to unexpected events or explaining how democracy got to this point. We support this mission by being helpful. We are committed to making Vox free, but our signature brand of explanatory journalism needs a lot of resources. Ads alone aren’t enough to support it. Gift Vox today to make this kind of work available to everyone for free.

    yes i will give you $250/Year

    yes i will give you $250/Year

    credit card, Apple Pay,

    google pay.You can also contribute via



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Tumblr Email
    admin1
    • Website

    Related Posts

    News January 31, 2023

    The impact of Google and other tech layoffs on other industries

    News January 30, 2023

    Google, Facebook, and Microsoft want to be scrappy startups again

    News January 27, 2023

    Why are Tesla fires so hard to put out?

    News January 26, 2023

    Thanks to OpenAI, Microsoft beats Google in the artificial intelligence game

    News January 25, 2023

    Facebook lifts ban on former President Donald Trump

    News January 24, 2023

    DOJ sues Google again for antitrust violations over its ads

    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Recent Comments

    No comments to show.

    Archives

    • February 2023
    • January 2023
    • December 2022
    • November 2022
    • October 2022
    • September 2022
    • March 2022
    • February 2022
    • December 2021

    Categories

    • Crypto
    • Make money
    • News
    • Startup
    • Technology
    • Trending
    • Uncategorized
    Facebook Twitter Instagram Pinterest
    • Home
    • Contact us
    • DMCA
    • Privacy Policy
    • Sitemap
    © 2023 opzionebinaria. Designed by opzionebinaria.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.